Πέμπτη 14 Οκτωβρίου 2021

Factors associated with success following transcervical innominate artery suspension

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

Message:

Innominate artery compression of the trachea: diagnosis and treatment by anterior suspension. A 25-year experience
S C Adler 1, G Isaacson, R K Balsara
Affiliations collapse
Affiliation
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
PMID: 7492062 DOI: 10.1177/000348949510401202
Abstract
Suspension of the innominate artery to the sternum has been a widely accepted therapy for the relief of tracheal compression. Recently, reimplantation of the innominate artery has been advocated as a superior operative procedure. While generally successful, arterial transfer carries the risk of early bleeding and stroke, and the potential for late stenosis at the anastomotic site. Between 1969 and 1994, 25 infants and children at our institution received diagnoses of innominate artery compression and were treated by anterior suspension. All presented with stridor and one third had a history of suspected or proven apnea. Twenty-four children had excellent results, while 1 required resuspension after stridor returned. There were no major complications. Our series strongly supports the belief that anterior suspension of the innominate artery is a successful and reliable operation with minimal morbidity and mortality. More complex procedures are rarely indicated.

1-s2.0-S0165587621X00080-cov150h.gif

Publication date: Available online 13 October 2021

Source: International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

Author(s): Douglas Clayton von Allmen, Cherie Torres-Silva, Michael J. Rutter

View on the web

The PRO-ACTIVE trial protocol: a randomized study comparing the effectiveness of PROphylACTic swallow InterVEntion for patients receiving radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

pubmed-meta-image.png

BMC Cancer. 2021 Oct 13;21(1):1100. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08826-0.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Swallowing therapy is commonly provided as a treatment to lessen the risk or severity of dysphagia secondary to radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC); however, best practice is not yet established. This trial will compare the effectiveness of prophylactic (high and low intensity) versus reactive interventions for swallowing in patients with HNC undergoing RT.

METHODS: This multi-site, inter national randomized clinical trial (RCT) will include 952 adult patients receiving radiotherapy for HNC and who are at high risk for post-RT dysphagia. Participants will be randomized to receive one of three interventions for swallowing during RT: RE-ACTIVE, started promptly if/when dysphagia is identified; PRO-ACTIVE EAT, low intensity prophylactic intervention started before RT commences; or, PRO-ACTIVE EAT+EXERCISE, high intensity prophylactic intervention also started before RT commences. We hypothesize that the PRO-ACTIVE therapies are more effective than late RE-ACTIVE therapy; and, that the more intensive PRO-ACTIVE (EAT + EXERCISE) is superior to the low intensive PRO-ACTIVE (EAT). The primary endpoint of effectiveness is duration of feeding tube dependency one year post radiation therapy, selected as a pragmatic outcome valued equally by diverse stakeholders (e.g., patients, caregivers and clinicians). Secondary outcomes will include objective measures of swallow physiology and function, pneumonia and weight loss, along with various patient-reported swallowing-related outcomes, such as quality of life, symptom burden, and self-efficacy.

DISCUSSION: Dysphagia is a common and potentially life-threatening chronic toxicity of radiotherapy, and a priority issue for HNC survivors. Yet, the optimal timing and intensity of swallowing therapy provided by a speech-language pathologist is not known. With no clearly preferred strategy, current practice is fraught with substantial variation. The pragmatic PRO-ACTIVE trial aims to specifically address the decisional dilemma of when swallowing therapy should begin (i.e., before or after a swallowing problem develops). The critical impact of this dilemma is heightened by the growing number of young HNC patients in healthcare systems that need to allocate resources most effectively. The results of the PRO-ACTIVE trial will address the global uncertainty regarding best practice for dysphagia management in HNC pat ients receiving radiotherapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol is registered with the US Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and the PRO-ACTIVE trial was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , under the identifier NCT03455608 ; First posted: Mar 6, 2018; Last verified: Jun 17, 2021. Protocol Version: 1.3 (January 27, 2020).

PMID:34645411 | DOI:10.1186/s12885-021-08826-0

View on the web

Association of Performance on Dichotic Auditory Tests With Risk for Incident Dementia and Alzheimer Dementia

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

Message:

Dichotic Dysaudia occurs when both ears are weak at transferring auditory information to the correct brain hemisphere. A child with either of these deficits will struggle to hear in a noisy classroom and will generally have poorer attention than their peers.

Auditory processing is a term used to describe what happens when your brain recognizes and interprets the sounds around you. Humans hear when energy that we recognize as sound travels through the ear and is changed into electrical information that can be interpreted by the brain.

Dichotic listening is the auditory process that involves listening with both ears. ... Binaural separation is the ability to perceive an acoustic message in one ear while ignoring a different acoustic message in the other ear.

Dichotic listening (DL) tests are among the most frequently included in batteries for the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders (APD) in children. A finding of atypical left ear advantage (LEA) for speech-related stimuli is often taken by clinical audiologists as an indicator for APD.

Dichotic listening is a psychological test commonly used to investigate selective attention and the lateralization of brain function within the auditory system. It is used within the fields of cognitive psychology and neuroscience.

Key Points
Question Is the association between poor hearing and dementia associated with signal sensitivity, central auditory processing, or both?

Findings In this prospective cohort study of 280 adults without dementia, measures of dichotic auditory processing were associated with increased dementia and Alzheimer dementia risk independently of signal sensitivity. Measures of signal audibility had a weak and insignificant association with dementia risk, and that association disappeared when controlling for dichotic auditory processing.

Meaning The associations between poor hearing and dementia risk may be more specific to dichotic processing than signal audibility or monaural speech tests.

Abstract
Importance Age-related hearing difficulties can include problems with signal audibility and central auditory processing. Studies have demonstrated associations between audibility and dementia risk. To our knowledge, limited data exist to determine whether audibility, central processing, or both drive these associations.

Objective To determine the associations between signal sensitivity, central auditory processing, and dementia and Alzheimer dementia (AD) risk.

Design, Setting, and Participants This follow-up observational study of a sample from the prospective Adult Changes in Thought study of dementia risk was conducted at Kaiser Permanente Washington, a western Washington health care delivery system, and included 280 volunteer participants without dementia who were evaluated from October 2003 to February 2006 with follow-up through September 2018. Analyses began in 2019 and continued through 2021.

Exposures Hearing tests included pure tone signal audibility, a monaural word recognition test, and 2 dichotic tests: the Dichotic Sentence Identification (DSI) test and the Dichotic Digits test (DDT).

Main Outcomes and Measures Cognition was assessed biennially with the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (range, 1-100; higher scores are better), and scores of less than 86 prompted clinical and neuropsychological evaluations. All data were reviewed at multidisciplinary consensus conferences, and standardized criteria were used to define incident cases of dementia and probable or possible AD. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine associations with hearing test performance.

Results A total of 280 participants (177 women [63%]; mean [SD] age, 79.5 [5.2] years). As of September 2018, there were 2196 person-years of follow-up (mean, 7.8 years) and 89 incident cases of dementia (66 not previously analyzed), of which 84 (94.4%) were AD (63 not previously analyzed). Compared with people with DSI scores of more than 80, the dementia adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for DSI scores of less than 50 was 4.18 (95% CI, 2.37-7.38; P < .001); for a DSI score of 50 to 80, it was 1.82 (95% CI, 1.10-3.04; P = .02). Compared with people with DDT scores of more than 80, the dementia aHR for DDT scores of less than 50 was 2.66 (95% CI, 1.31-5.42; P = .01); for a DDT score of 50 to 80, it was 2.40 (95% CI, 1.45-3.98; P = .001). The AD results were similar. Pure tone averages were weakly and insignificantly associated with dementia and AD, and associations were null when controlling for DSI scores.

Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, abnormal central auditory processing as measured by dichotic tests was independently associated with dementia and AD risk.

jamanetwork.com

This cohort study examines associations between signal sensitivity, central auditory processing, and dementia and Alzheimer dementia risk.
View on the web

Association of Bone Conduction Devices for Single-Sided Sensorineural Deafness With QOL

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

jamanetwork.com

This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses quality of life measures among patients with single-sided sensorineural deafness who received a unilateral bone conduction device.
View on the web

The Substantial Omission of Postoperative Radiotherapy in Patients With Advanced-Stage Oral Cancer

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

jamanetwork.com

This cohort study aims to identify factors associated with omission of adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy in patients with advanced-stage oral squamous cell cancers in the US.
View on the web

Prophylactic Steroids for Postthyroidectomy Hypocalcemia and Voice Dysfunction

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

jamanetwork.com

This randomized clinical trial investigates the use of dexamethasone to prevent postoperative hypocalcemia and voice dysfunction in patients undergoing thyroidectomy.
View on the web

Acute Vision Loss From IgG4-Related and Bacterial Rhinosinusitis After COVID-19

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

jamanetwork.com

This case report describes a man in his 70s who presented to the emergency department with a headache for 2 weeks and vision loss in the right eye for 2 days and was subsequently diagnosed with IgG4-related and Streptococcus constellatus rhinosinusitis.
View on the web

Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone in Minimally Invasive Parathyroidectomy

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

jamanetwork.com

To the Editor My attention was arrested by the article by Quinn et al on the use of intraoperative parathyroid hormone (ioPTH) in minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP). To our knowledge, it is the first meta-analysis on this topic showing a beneficial association of ioPTH with cure rates—98% vs 94.8% without ioPTH. It will have a considerable effect on surgical treatment for PHP. Nonetheless, I have some comments on the methodology, results, and conclusion of the trial.
View on the web

Continuous Local Anesthetic Wound Infusions as Postoperative Standard of Care in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

jamanetwork.com

To the Editor We thank Gostian et al for their study demonstrating a reduction in postoperative pain when continuous wound infusion (CWI) was used after head and neck oncological resections. The authors call for CWI to be assimilated into the multimodal postoperative analgesic concept in patients. However, prior to widespread implementation, we find it prudent to draw attention to a few caveats to the study's conclusions.
View on the web

Neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors for Resectable Head and Neck Cancer

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

jamanetwork.com

This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
View on the web

Symptoms With New Loss of Taste or Smell in Adults With or Without SARS-CoV-2 Infection

xlomafota13 shared this article with you from Inoreader

Message:

There have been reports of loss of taste or smell associated with viral infections, including SARS-CoV-2. However, it is not clear whether these symptoms are more frequent in SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with other viral infections.1,2 Prior studies among individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection suggest loss of taste or smell occurs early in the disease course and is associated with younger age, female sex, and milder disease.1,3-5 Those studies largely have not examined which symptoms occur with new loss of taste or smell. Identifying concomitant symptoms may guide future studies to identify a pattern of symptoms that form a unique clinical presentation. We therefore described which symptoms were reported with new loss of taste or smell among individuals with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Methods
Data for this cross-sectional study were collected from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Coronavirus Self-checker (online since March 2020), an online tool designed to assist users in deciding whether to seek testing or medical care per guidelines from possible SARS-CoV-2 exposure.6 Users selected hard-coded responses that included demographics (age, sex, race, ethnicity), any COVID-19 test results within the past 10 days (positive, negative), and symptoms (new loss of taste or smell, muscle aches or body aches, cough, mild or moderate difficulty breathing, fever, vomiting or diarrhea, headache, congestion or runny nose, sore throat, other). Vaccination status was not recorded. The sample included 59 153 completed uses of the tool occurring between February 2 and May 3, 2021, by US adults 18 years or older who reported test results. This study was reviewed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and its conduct was consistent with applicable feder al law and CDC policy (45 CFR §46, 21 CFR §56, 42 USC §241(d), 5 USC §552a, and 44 USC §3501 et seq). This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline.

To evaluate the association between each symptom and new loss of taste or smell, multivariate logistic models estimated odds ratios (ORs) stratified by test positivity and adjusted for each demographic variable and symptom. For all statistical analyses, SAS, version 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc) was used.

Results
The Table shows respondent characteristics from 59 153 completed uses of the tool. The largest age group was 18 to 29 years (15 792 [26.7%]), 38 798 (65.6%) were female, and 37 025 (62.6%) were non-Hispanic White respondents. Symptoms associated with new loss of taste or smell varied by SARS-CoV-2 test positivity (Figure). Among individuals with negative test results, congestion or runny nose was more strongly associated with loss of taste and smell (OR, 2.26 [95% CI, 2.08-2.45]) compared with those with positive test results (OR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.54-1.79]). Among individuals with negative test results, cough and fever were significantly associated with new loss of taste or smell (cough: OR, 1.57 [95% CI, 1.45-1.69]; fever: OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.07-1.25]) but not among those with positive test results (cough: OR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.94-1.09]; fever: OR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.88-1.02]). Vomiting or diarrhea was more strongly associated with new loss of taste or smell among those with posit ive test results (OR, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.40-1.65] compared with those with negative test results (OR, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.13-1.35]).

Discussion
The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that differences in symptoms occurring with new loss of taste or smell were seen between groups based on SARS-CoV-2 test positivity. In both groups, muscle aches or body aches, mild or moderate difficulty breathing, vomiting or diarrhea, and congestion or runny nose were associated with a new loss of taste or smell. However, in both groups with positive and negative test results, congestion or runny nose had strong associations with new loss of taste or smell, suggesting the latter may not be a valid marker of test positivity in this sample.

One particular strength of this study is the large sample of recent data. Limitations include possible residual confounding inherent in observational data and potential for data to partially reflect individuals who used the tool multiple times and/or had been vaccinated. There may also be selection bias from analyzing online data, as respondents were, on average, younger and more likely to be female compared with the general population. Users may also have been aware of loss of taste or smell as a symptom of COVID-19, which may have resulted in bias and/or loss of power. Further studies in other populations may elucidate whether symptoms accompanying a new loss of taste or smell may form part of a unique clinical presentation associated with a milder course of disease.

jamanetwork.com

This cross-sectional study uses data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Coronavirus Self-checker to assess which symptoms are reported with new loss of taste or smell among individuals with and without SARS-CoV-2.
View on the web

Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου