Τετάρτη 28 Δεκεμβρίου 2022

Esthetic and clinical outcomes after immediate placement and restoration: Comparison of two implant systems in the anterior maxilla—A cross‐sectional study

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

Abstract

Aim

To assess the esthetic and clinical performance of a novel self-tapping implant system for single-tooth restorations in the esthetic zone after immediate placement and provisionalization.

Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional study included 52 patients contributing a total of 52 immediately placed and restored implants with ≥12 months after functional loading, comparing two different implant systems: Straumann® BLX (Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland; 25 patients) and Ankylos® (Dentsply Sirona, Hanau, Germany; 27 patients). As the primary outcome measure, peri-implant tissue esthetics were assessed by means of pink esthetics score (PES) rated by three independent clinicians. Moreover, as secondary outcome measures, the peri-implant tissue health was assessed by means of bleeding on probing, probing depth, and suppuration. Apart from that, the modified plaque index, keratinized mucosa width, and the presence of mucosal recessions were also assessed. When clinical signs suggested the possibility of peri-implantitis, radiographs were indicated to assess progressive bone loss.

Results

The mean PES ratings were 12.10 ± 1.10 for Ankylos versus 11.2 ± 1.86 for BLX, both achieving good esthetic results without significant differences (p = 0.143). There were no differences among most clinical parameters (plaque, bleeding on probing, probing depth, peri-implant mucosal recession), although peri-implant mucositis was present in one-third of the cases. The inter-rater agreement on esthetics was not significant (p < 0.250).

Conclusion

Within the limitations of the present study, it was concluded that the use of either BLX or Ankylos implant systems was associated to comparable peri-implant health and good pink esthetic outcomes during immediate implantation and restoration protocols, for at least 12 months.

View on Web

Τρίτη 27 Δεκεμβρίου 2022

Transmitted drug resistance to integrase based first-line HIV antiretroviral regimens in the Mediterranean Europe

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader
Abstract
Objective
To study the prevalence of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) to INSTIs and NRTIs, and of clinically relevant resistance (CRR), in newly-diagnosed people with HIV (PWH) naïve to antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Europe.
Methods
MeditRes HIV is a consortium that includes ART naïve PWH newly diagnosed in France, Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain during the years 2018-2021. Reverse transcriptase (RT) and Integrase (INSTI) sequences were provided by participating centers. To evaluate the prevalence of surveillance drug resistance mutations (SDRM) we used the CPR tools from Stanford HIV-website. To evaluate clinically relevant resistance (CRR), defined as any resistance level >= 3, we used the Stanford v.9.1HIVDB Algorithm.
Results
We included 2705 PWH, 72% men, median age of 37 (IQR, 30-48); 43.7% infected by non-B subtypes. The prevalence of INSTI-SDRMs was 0.30% (T66I, T66A, E92Q, E138T, E138K, Y143R, S147G and R263K, all n = 1), and of NRTI-SDRMs was 5.77% (M184V n = 23, 0.85%; M184I n = 5, 0.18%; K65R/N n = 3, 0.11%; K70E n = 2, 0.07%; L74V/I n = 5, 0.18%; any TAMs n = 118, 4.36%). INSTI-CRR was 2.33% (0.15% dolutegravir/bictegravir; 2.29% raltegravir/elvitegravir), and 1.74% to first-line NRTIs (0.89% tenofovir/tenofovir alafenamide fumarate; 1.74% abacavir; 1.07% lamivudine/emtricitabine).
Conclusions
We present the most recent data on TDR to integrase based first-line regimens in Europe. Given the low prevalence of CRR to second generation integrase inhibitors and to first-line NRTIs, in the years 2018-2021 it is unlikely that newly diagnosed PWH in MeditRes countries would present with baseline resistance to a first-line regimen based on second generation integrase inhibitors.
View on Web

Risk of waning humoral responses after inactivated or subunit recombinant SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination in patients with chronic diseases: Findings from a prospective observational study in China

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

Abstract

Heterogeneity of antibody responses has been reported in SARS-CoV-2 vaccination recipients with underlying diseases. We investigated the impact of the presence of comorbidities on the humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with chronic disease (PWCD) and assessed the effect of the number of comorbidities on the humoral response to vaccination. In this study, neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and IgG antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (RBD-IgG) were monitored following a full-course vaccination. In total, 1400 PWCD (82.7%, inactivated vaccines; 17.3%, subunit recombinant vaccine) and 245 healthy controls (65.7% inactivated vaccines, 34.3% subunit recombinant vaccine) vaccinated with inactivated or subunit recombinant SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, were included. The seroconversion and antibody levels of the NAbs and RBD-IgG were different in the PWCD group compared with those in the control group. Chronic hepatitis B (odds ratio [OR]: 0.65; 95% confidence interval [C I]: 0.46–0.93), cancer (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.42–0.99), and diabetes (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.28–0.89) were associated with lower seroconversion of NAbs. Chronic kidney disease (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.11–0.76), cancer (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.23–0.62), and diabetes (OR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.20–0.69) were associated with lower seroconversion of RBD-IgG. Only the presence of autoimmune disease showed significantly lower NAbs and RBD-IgG titers. Patients with most types of chronic diseases showed similar responses to the controls, but humoral responses were still significantly associated with the presence of ≥2 coexisting diseases. Our study suggested that humoral responses following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are impaired in patients with certain chronic diseases.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

View on Web

Coronavirus disease 2019 rebounds following nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

Abstract

Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV-r) is an effective anti-SARS-CoV-2 agent and has been recommended in the treatment of non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19. In rare occasions, some patients experience virologic and symptomatic rebound after initial resolution, which we call COVID-19 rebound after NMV-r. Although COVID rebound can also occur after molnupiravir treatment or even no antiviral treatment, we have more serious concern about the rebound after NMV-r, which remains the most effective antiviral. Due to a lack of information about its frequency, mechanism, outcomes, and management, we conducted this review to provide comprehensive and updated information to address these questions. Based on the limited evidence, the incidence of COVID-19 rebound after NMV-r was less than 2%, and most cases developed 5–15 days after initiating NMV-r treatment. Almost all reported cases had mild symptoms, and the clinical condition gradually subsided without additional treatment. Overall, the clinical outcome was favourable, and only a small number of patients required emergency department visits or hospitalization. Regarding virologic rebound, culturable SARS-CoV-2 with possible transmission was observed, so re-isolation may be needed.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

View on Web

CLEC5A expression can be triggered by spike glycoprotein and may be a potential target for COVID‐19 therapy

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

Abstract

The immune response is crucial for coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) progression, with the participation of proinflammatory cells and cytokines, inducing lung injury and loss of respiratory function. CLEC5A expression on monocytes can be triggered by viral and bacterial infections, leading to poor outcomes. SARS-CoV-2 is able to induce neutrophil activation by CLEC5A and Toll-like receptor 2, leading to an aggressive inflammatory cascade, but little information is known about the molecular interactions between CLEC5A and SARS-CoV-2 proteins. Here, we aimed to explore how CLEC5A expression could be affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection using immunological tools with in vitro, in vivo and in silico assays. The findings revealed that high levels of CLEC5A expression were found in monocytes from severe COVID-19 patients in comparison with mild COVID-19 and unexposed subjects, but not in vaccinated subjects who developed mild COVID-19. In hamsters, we detected CLEC5A ge ne expression during 3-15 days of Omicron strain viral challenge. Our results also showed that CLEC5A can interact with SARS-CoV-2, promoting inflammatory cytokine production, probably through an interaction with the receptor binding domain in the N-acetylglucosamine binding site (NAG-601). The high expression of CLEC5A and high levels of proinflammatory cytokine production were reduced in vitro by a human CLEC5A monoclonal antibody. Finally, CLEC5A was triggered by spike glycoprotein, suggesting its involvement in COVID-19 progression; therapy with a monoclonal antibody could be a good strategy for COVID-19 treatment, but vaccines are still the best option to avoid hospitalization/deaths.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

View on Web

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in adults: Characteristics, treatment, and outcomes

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

ABSTRACT

Following the rapidly increasing number of multisystem inflammatory syndromes in children (MIS-C), a similar clinical scenario has been observed in adult patients. Although its prevalence is low and probably related to underdiagnosis, its development can be associated with high mortality. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in adults (MIS-A) can develop following both asymptomatic and symptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and in previously healthy people. Like MIS-C, MIS-A is a multisystem disease that can involve the cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, dermatologic, hematologic, and neurologic systems. In addition to the clinical manifestations, the diagnosis of MIS-A requires laboratory evidence of inflammation and SARS-CoV-2 infection. The appropriate treatment for MIS-A remains unclear; anti-inflammatory agents, including intravenous immunoglobulin and corticosteroids, are commonly used. However, there are still many unknow ns regarding MIS-A. Further studies are needed to determine the true prevalence, pathogenesis, and effective treatment for MIS-A.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

View on Web

Recall of Daptomycin for Injection 500 mg/vial and Daptomycin for Injection 350 mg/vial Lot # R2200232 Due to Product Mix-Up

alexandrossfakianakis shared this article with you from Inoreader

FDA-Social-Graphic.png

Accord Healthcare, Inc. is voluntarily recalling a single lot of Daptomycin for Injection 500 mg/vial, and Daptomycin for Injection 350 mg/vial product contained in cartons imprinted with lot # R2200232 Exp: 01/2025 to the consumer/user level.
View on Web

Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου