Τρίτη 7 Απριλίου 2020

Point of care testing of Influenza A/B and RSV in an adult respiratory assessment unit is associated with improvement in isolation practices and reduction in hospital length of stay.

Point of care testing of Influenza A/B and RSV in an adult respiratory assessment unit is associated with improvement in isolation practices and reduction in hospital length of stay.:

pubmed256blue.png

Related Articles
Point of care testing of Influenza A/B and RSV in an adult respiratory assessment unit is associated with improvement in isolation practices and reduction in hospital length of stay.

J Med Microbiol. 2020 Apr 06;:

Authors: Berry L, Lansbury L, Gale L, Carroll AM, Lim WS

Abstract

Introduction. Every winter seasonal influenza and other viral respiratory infections increase pressure on the health services and are associated with nosocomial infection and morbidity.Aim. To compare provision of point-of-care (POC) testing with laboratory-based testing for influenza and RSV detection on an adult respiratory assessment unit to assess the impact on isolation practices and length of stay (LOS).Methodology. Prospective interrupted 'on-off' study in adults admitted to the respiratory unit between December 2018 and April 2019 with a suspected respiratory tract infection. Nasopharyngeal samples were tested using either the GeneXpert rapid POC test for influenza and RSV (on-period), or were sent to the laboratory for multiplex PCR testing against a panel of 12 respiratory viruses (off-period). Outcome measures were time to patient isolation for infection control, LOS and turnaround time from admission to test results.Results. Of 1145 patients evaluated, 755 were tested with POC and 390 with laboratory multiplex; a respiratory virus was identified in 164 (21.7 %) and 138 (35.4 %) patients respectively. A positive POC test was associated with a shorter time to isolation (mean difference 16.9 h, P<0.001), shorter LOS (mean difference 15.5 h, P=0.05,) and shorter turnaround time (mean difference 28.3 h, P<0.001), compared to laboratory testing.Conclusion. Use of GeneXpert POC testing for Flu/RSV is associated with rapid reporting of results with significant improvements in isolation practices and reductions in LOS.

PMID: 32250239 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Immunoactive preparations and regulatory responses in the respiratory tract: potential for clinical application in chronic inflammatory airway diseases.

Immunoactive preparations and regulatory responses in the respiratory tract: potential for clinical application in chronic inflammatory airway diseases.:

pubmed256blue.png

Related Articles
Immunoactive preparations and regulatory responses in the respiratory tract: potential for clinical application in chronic inflammatory airway diseases.

Expert Rev Respir Med. 2020 Apr 06;:

Authors: Feleszko W, Rossi GA, Krenke R, Canonica GW, van Gerven L, Kalyuzhin O

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of chronic inflammatory airway diseases is rising. Their treatment with corticosteroids increases infection risk, while overuse of antimicrobial agents may increase morbidity and antimicrobial resistance. Non-specific immunomodulatory compounds alter immune responses to both infectious and atopic challenges. These compounds may offer an alternative approach for symptom reduction and prophylaxis against both infections and exacerbations in chronic inflammatory airway disease.Areas covered: We assessed the available data on the efficacy of non-specific immunomodulators including bacterial lysates, synthetic compounds, and vaccines in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS); allergic and non-allergic rhinitis; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and asthma. A search of PubMed was carried out using the 'Clinical Trials' filter for each condition and immunomodulatory product detailed below, where available, data from meta-analyses were reported.Expert opinion: Pre-clinical data has revealed a coherent mechanistic path of action for oral immunomodulators on the respiratory immune system, principally via the gut-lung immune axis. In patients with asthma, allergic rhinitis, CRS, and COPD immunomodulatory therapy reduces symptoms, exacerbations, hospitalizations, and drug consumption. However, data are heterogeneous, and study quality remains limited. A lack of high-quality recent trials remains the major unmet research need in the field.

PMID: 32250709 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Anesthesia timing for children undergoing therapeutic cardiac catheterization after upper respiratory infection: a prospective observational study.

Anesthesia timing for children undergoing therapeutic cardiac catheterization after upper respiratory infection: a prospective observational study.:

pubmed256blue.png

Related Articles
Anesthesia timing for children undergoing therapeutic cardiac catheterization after upper respiratory infection: a prospective observational study.

Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Apr 06;:

Authors: Kan Z, Siyuan W, Mengqi L, Chi W, Liping S, Sen Z, Jie B, Mazhong Z, Jijian Z

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze anesthesia timing and perioperative respiratory adverse event (PRAE) risk factors in children undergoing therapeutic cardiac catheterization after upper respiratory tract infection (URI).

METHODS: We prospectively included children for elective therapeutic cardiac catheterization. Parents or legal guardians were asked to complete a questionnaire on the child's demographics, tobacco exposure, and URI symptoms. PRAEs (laryngospasm, bronchospasm, coughing, airway secretion, airway obstruction, and oxygen desaturation) as well as details of anesthesia management were recorded.

RESULTS: Of 332 children, 201 had a history of URI in the preceding eight weeks. The occurrence rate of PRAEs in children with URI ≤two weeks reached the highest proportion, which was higher than that in children without URI (66.3% vs 46.6%, P = 0.007). The overall incidence of PRAEs in children with URI in 3-8 weeks was significantly lower than that in children with URI in the recent ≤two weeks (49.0% vs. 66.3%, P = 0.007), and similar to that in the control group (49.0% vs. 46.6%). Multivariate analysis showed association between PRAEs and type of congenital heart disease (CHD) (P < 0.001), anesthesia timing (P = 0.007), and age (P = 0.021). Delayed schedule (two weeks after URI) minimized the risk of PRAEs to the level comparable to that observed in children without URI (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.64-1.91; P = 0.707).

CONCLUSIONS: If treatment is not urgent, a pediatric patient at a high risk of PRAEs will be benefit from the postponement of an interventional operation by at least two weeks after URI.

PMID: 32251574 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Safety and immunogenicity of a parenteral trivalent P2-VP8 subunit rotavirus vaccine: a multisite, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Safety and immunogenicity of a parenteral trivalent P2-VP8 subunit rotavirus vaccine: a multisite, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.:

pubmed256blue.png

Related Articles
Safety and immunogenicity of a parenteral trivalent P2-VP8 subunit rotavirus vaccine: a multisite, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 03;:

Authors: Groome MJ, Fairlie L, Morrison J, Fix A, Koen A, Masenya M, Jose L, Madhi SA, Page N, McNeal M, Dally L, Cho I, Power M, Flores J, Cryz S

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A monovalent, parenteral, subunit rotavirus vaccine was well tolerated and immunogenic in adults in the USA and in toddlers and infants in South Africa, but elicited poor responses against heterotypic rotavirus strains. We aimed to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of a trivalent vaccine formulation (P2-VP8-P[4],[6],[8]).

METHODS: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation, phase 1/2 study was done at three South African research sites. Healthy adults (aged 18-45 years), toddlers (aged 2-3 years), and infants (aged 6-8 weeks, ≥37 weeks' gestation, and without previous receipt of rotavirus vaccination), all without HIV infection, were eligible for enrolment. In the dose-escalation phase, adults and toddlers were randomly assigned in blocks (block size of five) to receive 30 μg or 90 μg of vaccine, or placebo, and infants were randomly assigned in blocks (block size of four) to receive 15 μg, 30 μg, or 90 μg of vaccine, or placebo. In the expanded phase, infants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive 15 μg, 30 μg, or 90 μg of vaccine, or placebo, in block sizes of four. Participants, parents of participants, and clinical, data, and laboratory staff were masked to treatment assignment. Adults received an intramuscular injection of vaccine or placebo in the deltoid muscle on the day of randomisation (day 0), day 28, and day 56; toddlers received a single injection of vaccine or placebo in the anterolateral thigh on day 0. Infants in both phases received an injection of vaccine or placebo in the anterolateral thigh on days 0, 28, and 56, at approximately 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age. Primary safety endpoints were local and systemic reactions (grade 2 or worse) within 7 days and adverse events and serious adverse events within 28 days after each injection in all participants who received at least one injection. Primary immunogenicity endpoints were analysed in infants in either phase who received all planned injections, had blood samples analysed at the relevant timepoints, and presented no major protocol violations considered to have an effect on the immunogenicity results of the study, and included serum anti-P2-VP8 IgA, IgG, and neutralising antibody geometric mean titres and responses measured 4 weeks after the final injection in vaccine compared with placebo groups. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02646891.

FINDINGS: Between Feb 15, 2016, and Dec 22, 2017, 30 adults (12 each in the 30 μg and 90 μg groups and six in the placebo group), 30 toddlers (12 each in the 30 μg and 90 μg groups and six in the placebo group), and 557 infants (139 in the 15 μg group, 140 in the 30 μg group, 139 in the 90 μg group, and 139 in the placebo group) were randomly assigned, received at least one dose, and were assessed for safety. There were no significant differences in local or systemic adverse events, or unsolicited adverse events, between vaccine and placebo groups. There were no serious adverse events within 28 days of injection in adults, whereas one serious adverse event occurred in a toddler (febrile convulsion in the 30 μg group) and 23 serious adverse events (four in placebo, ten in 15 μg, four in 30 μg, and five in 90 μg groups) occurred among 20 infants, most commonly respiratory tract infections. One death occurred in an infant within 28 days of injection due to pneumococcal meningitis. In 528 infants (130 in placebo, 132 in 15 μg, 132 in 30 μg, and 134 in 90 μg groups), adjusted anti-P2-VP8 IgG seroresponses (≥4-fold increase from baseline) to P[4], P[6], and P[8] antigens were significantly higher in the 15 μg, 30 μg, and 90 μg groups (99-100%) than in the placebo group (10-29%; p<0·0001). Although significantly higher than in placebo recipients (9-10%), anti-P2-VP8 IgA seroresponses (≥4-fold increase from baseline) to each individual antigen were modest (20-34%) across the 15 μg, 30 μg, and 90 μg groups. Adjusted neutralising antibody seroresponses in infants (≥2·7-fold increase from baseline) to DS-1 (P[4]), 1076 (P[6]), and Wa (P[8]) were higher in vaccine recipients than in placebo recipients: p<0·0001 for all comparisons.

INTERPRETATION: The trivalent P2-VP8 vaccine was well tolerated, with promising anti-P2-VP8 IgG and neutralising antibody responses across the three vaccine P types. Our findings support advancing the vaccine to efficacy testing.

FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

PMID: 32251641 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Human bocavirus 1 and 2 genotypes detected in younger Amazonian children with acute gastroenteritis or respiratory infections respectively.

Human bocavirus 1 and 2 genotypes detected in younger Amazonian children with acute gastroenteritis or respiratory infections respectively.:

pubmed256blue.png

Related Articles
Human bocavirus 1 and 2 genotypes detected in younger Amazonian children with acute gastroenteritis or respiratory infections respectively.

Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 03;:

Authors: Azevedo Alves Leitão G, Ignácio Olivares Olivares A, Cardoso Pimenta Y, Fernandes Delgado I, Pereira Miagostovich M, Gagliardi Leite JP, de Moraes MTB

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to verify the frequency, genotypes and etiological role of Human Bocavirus (HBoV) in younger Amazonian children with either acute gastroenteritis (AGE) or respiratory infections (ARI). The influence of Rotarix™ vaccination and co-infection status was investigated.

DESIGN: HBoV quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) testing of both fecal and saliva (1468 samples) from 734 children <5 months old living in the Amazon (Brazil, Guyana and Venezuela). High and median HBoV viral load samples were used for extraction, nested PCR amplification and sequencing for genotyping. HBoV mRNA detection was done by reverse transcription following DNA amplification.

RESULTS: The overall HBoV frequencies were 14.2% (69/485; AGE) and 14.1% (35/249; ARI) (p =  0.83). HBoV exclusively infected 4.5% (22/485; AGE) and 4% (10/249) of the Amazonian children (Odds ratios 1.13, 95% confidence interval= 2.42-0.52). HBoV 1 was mainly detected in feces and saliva from AGE children; and HBoV2, from ARI children. HBoV mRNA was detected only in feces. The Rotarix™ vaccination status did not affect the HBoV frequencies.

CONCLUSIONS: We suggested that, after entry into the air/oral pathways, HBoV1 continues infecting towards the intestinal tract causing AGE. HBoV2 can be a causative agent of AGE and ARI in younger Amazonian children.

PMID: 32251804 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Hospital-Acquired Viral Respiratory Tract Infections in the Neonatal Unit: A Comparison with Other Inpatient Groups.

Hospital-Acquired Viral Respiratory Tract Infections in the Neonatal Unit: A Comparison with Other Inpatient Groups.:

pubmed256blue.png

Related Articles
Hospital-Acquired Viral Respiratory Tract Infections in the Neonatal Unit: A Comparison with Other Inpatient Groups.

Neonatology. 2020 Apr 06;:1-4

Authors: Taylor C, Tan S, McClaughry R, Sharkey D

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired viral respiratory tract infections (VRTIs) cause significant morbidity and mortality in neonatal patients. This includes escalation of respiratory support, increased length of hospital stay, and need for home oxygen, as well as higher healthcare costs. To date, no studies have compared population rates of VRTIs across age groups.

AIM: Quantify the rates of hospital-acquired VRTIs in our neonatal population compared with other inpatient age groups in Nottinghamshire, UK.

METHODS: We compared all hospital inpatient PCR-positive viral respiratory samples between 2007 and 2013 and calculated age-stratified rates based on population estimates.

RESULTS: From a population of 4,707,217, we identified a previously unrecognised burden of VRTI in neonatal patients, only second to the 0-1-year-old group. Although only accounting for 1.3% of the population, half of the infections were in infants <1 year old and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients. Human rhinovirus was the most dominant virus across the inpatient group, particularly in neonatal patients. Despite a two- to three-fold increase in the rate of positive samples in all groups during the colder months (1.1/1,000 October-March vs. 0.4/1,000 April-September), rates in the NICU did not change throughout the year at 4.3/1,000. Pandemic H1N1 influenza rates were 20 times higher in neonatal patients and infants <1 year old.

CONCLUSION: Good epidemiological and interventional data are needed to help inform visiting and infection control policies to reduce transmission of hospital-acquired viral infections to this vulnerable population, particularly during pandemic seasons.

PMID: 32252052 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Epidemiology, virology, and clinical features of severe acute respiratory syndrome -coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2; Coronavirus Disease-19).

Epidemiology, virology, and clinical features of severe acute respiratory syndrome -coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2; Coronavirus Disease-19).:

pubmed256blue.png

Related Articles
Epidemiology, virology, and clinical features of severe acute respiratory syndrome -coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2; Coronavirus Disease-19).

Clin Exp Pediatr. 2020 Apr 02;:

Authors: Park SE

Abstract

A cluster of severe pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan City, Hubei province in China emerged in December 2019. A novel coronavirus named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was isolated from lower respiratory tract sample as the causative agent. The current outbreak of infections with SARS-CoV-2 is termed Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) by the World Health Organization (WHO). COVID-19 rapidly spread into at least 114 countries and killed more than 4,000 people by March 11 2020. WHO officially declared COVID-19 a pandemic on March 11, 2020. There have been two novel coronavirus outbreaks in the past two decades. The 2002-2003 outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2002-2003 caused by SARS-CoV had a case fatality rate of around 10% (8,098 confirmed cases and 774 death), while Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) caused by MERS-CoV killed 861 people out of a total 2,502 confirmed cases between 2012 and 2019. The purpose of this review is to summarize known-to-date information about SARS-CoV-2, transmission of SARS-CoV-2, and clinical features.

PMID: 32252141 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Αρχειοθήκη ιστολογίου