Publication date: Available online 19 February 2020
Source: American Journal of Otolaryngology
Author(s): Eleftherios Savvas, Katharina Heslinga, Benedikt Sundermann, Wolfram Schwindt, Christoph Otto Spiekermann, Mario Koopmann, Claudia Rudack
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine various preoperative factors that can play a role in the auditory rehabilitation outcome of cochlear implant (CI) recipients.
In order to determine the level of integrity of central processing preoperatively, special attention was given to residual hearing, duration of deafness, and cochlear nerve diameter as prognostic factors.
A cohort of 232 (272 CI implantations) postlingually deafened adults was evaluated in this study. Hearing results at 1, 2 and up to 3 years postoperatively were compared with various preoperative factors: promontory stimulation testing, residual hearing, duration of deafness, and magnetic resonance imaging of the cochlear nerve. Postoperative hearing performance was measured based on the German Freiburg monosyllabic word test and the Oldenburg sentence test.
Postoperative hearing performance showed a significant improvement in each consecutive year after implantation. Duration of deafness showed a negative correlation to word recognition and a positive correlation to increased signal-to-noise-ratio in sentence testing. A significant decline in hearing outcome was shown starting around the second decade of deafness corresponding to 66% of life spent in deafness. MR imaging of cochlear nerve diameter shows a positive correlation of larger nerve diameter to better speech understanding. Promontory stimulation testing did not show any prognostic value.
In this retrospective review it could be shown that there is an intricate interaction in the preoperative variables: duration of deafness – as well as the ratio of life spent in deafness; residual hearing; and cochlear nerve diameter.
In order to determine the level of integrity of central processing preoperatively, special attention was given to residual hearing, duration of deafness, and cochlear nerve diameter as prognostic factors.
A cohort of 232 (272 CI implantations) postlingually deafened adults was evaluated in this study. Hearing results at 1, 2 and up to 3 years postoperatively were compared with various preoperative factors: promontory stimulation testing, residual hearing, duration of deafness, and magnetic resonance imaging of the cochlear nerve. Postoperative hearing performance was measured based on the German Freiburg monosyllabic word test and the Oldenburg sentence test.
Postoperative hearing performance showed a significant improvement in each consecutive year after implantation. Duration of deafness showed a negative correlation to word recognition and a positive correlation to increased signal-to-noise-ratio in sentence testing. A significant decline in hearing outcome was shown starting around the second decade of deafness corresponding to 66% of life spent in deafness. MR imaging of cochlear nerve diameter shows a positive correlation of larger nerve diameter to better speech understanding. Promontory stimulation testing did not show any prognostic value.
In this retrospective review it could be shown that there is an intricate interaction in the preoperative variables: duration of deafness – as well as the ratio of life spent in deafness; residual hearing; and cochlear nerve diameter.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου