Readability of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Head and Neck Oncology.

Readability of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Head and Neck Oncology.:

Readability of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Head and Neck Oncology.

Laryngoscope. 2020 Feb 20;:

Authors: Lee SE, Farzal Z, Ebert CS, Zanation AM

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are communication tools to help patients convey their disease experience to medical providers and guide management decisions. However, the utility of healthcare outcome measures is dependent on patient literacy and readability of PROMs. If written for a more advanced literacy level, they can misestimate symptoms and add significant barriers to care, especially in the underserved. However, readability of head and neck (H&N) oncology PROMs has not been assessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the readability of H&N oncology PROMs to assess whether they meet recommended readability levels.

STUDY DESIGN: Bibliometric review.

METHODS: Three readability measures: Gunning Fog, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, and FORCAST were used to evaluate the readability level of commonly used H&N PROMs. PROMs with sixth grade readability level or lower were considered to meet the recommendations of health literacy experts.

RESULTS: Eight H&N oncology PROMs were reviewed. None of H&N PROMs met health literacy experts' and National Institutes of Health recommended reading levels. Gunning Fog consistently estimated easiest readability and FORCAST the most difficult.

CONCLUSIONS: PROMs are important clinical tools that drive patient-centric care in H&N oncology. All H&N PROMs are written above recommended reading levels and do not meet suggested standards. Future PROMs should be written with easier readability to accurately convey patients' H&N oncology disease experiences.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 2020.

PMID: 32078176 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]