Relationship of Aortic Bifurcation with Sacropelvic Anatomy: Application to Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Relationship of Aortic Bifurcation with Sacropelvic Anatomy: Application to Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion:

Abstract

Introduction

Various sacropelvic parameters such as the Pelvic Incidence (PI) are used to predict ideal lumbar lordosis and aid surgical planning. The objective of this study was to establish the relationship between the location of the aortic bifurcation from the sacral promontory and sacropelvic measures including the PI.

Materials and Methods

165 CT scans obtained for major trauma including the entire spine were identified. Sacropelvic parameters including Pelvic Incidence (PI), Sacral Anatomic Orientation (SAO), Pelvic Thickness (PTH) and, Sacral Table Angle (STA) were measured. Aortic bifurcation was identified on sagittal and coronal imaging and the distance from the sacral promontory (BPD) measured (mm).

Results

Mean age of the cohort was 44.3 years (s.d. 18.5; range 16–88 years); 61.8% male. The mean PI was 49.2° (s.d. 10.2°; range 30°‐80°). The mean BPD was 66.4 mm (s.d. 13.1 mm; range 38.3‐100 mm). In the majority the bifurcation was at the level of the L4 vertebral body (72.7%). Only age (r = −0.389; p < 0.0001) and PTH (r = 0.172; p = 0.027) correlated with the BPD to a significant degree. PI did not correlate with BPD (r = 0.061; p = 0.435). Linear regression analysis provided the following predictive equation: BPD = 34.3 mm + 0.30 x PTH.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates a lack of any meaningful correlation between sagittal pelvic parameters and the distance of the aortic bifurcation from the sacral promontory. Surgical planning for fusion surgery in the lumbar spine should include assessment of spinopelvic parameters and if anterior access to the lumbar disc(s) necessary, vascular anatomy should be carefully assessed independent of these measures.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.